The Best Baseball Talk Online™      About | Terms of Service | FAQ | Moderators
841 / 1385
Dec 2023

One more upper minors arm. Missed a couple of years with TJ and the pandemic but came back throwing a bit harder. HS pick who just reached free agency relatively quickly. Reading rotation potentially. Clearly we have a deficit in upper minors depth pitching.

He's interesting, seems like he needs some refinement in the pitching lab. His delivery looks over the top, but low. His fastball looks like it hops when it's high and flat when it's at the knees. Breaking ball looks very inconsistent- looks like it plays well when it sweeps down to his glove hand side but otherwise a lot of hittable offerings. He looks like a candidate for the split change!

On a separate note, the Phils would be one of the clubs checking in on Framber Valdez, right? I'd be about as excited about him as I would Yamamoto.

I dunno, you think? They'd probably still have to offload Walker in a separate deal, or perhaps include Sanchez in the trade. But it would surely cost another big chip, if not two. And all the teams thinking about Burnes or Bieber would come in with higher offers.

We certainly haven't heard anything about the Phillies being in on Cease either.

I personally can't believe the Astros would trade him to avoid the tax/make room for relief pitching, which seems to be where they are. But owners certainly have been known to do it!

They have the chips to make that kind of move- Painter, Abel, Crawford, Kierkering, Miller...these guys are premium, not to mention the value Sanchez brings as a major league ready left handed starting pitcher. They all of course have real value to the Phillies future, but it's a no-brainer to give up 2 of them in a larger package for another rotation anchor.

Well, I guess that's what I'm asking. Do they really have the chips to make it a no-brainer? And is Framber really an ace/anchor? Granted his down year was still great for most people. I'm probably just too recently remembering his post-season (not the one against us, the last one).

With Framber I guess the question is would you rather have him or Wheeler for three years? Because Wheeler only costs you money.

And Framber is better than Yamamoto now of course, and maybe always, but the latter you are betting on youth and having him for 10 years (and it still only costs you money).

That's the huge part.

I'm not opposed to the team beginning to trade from depth before this window closes, especially since not all of these prospects - particularly the pitchers - will pan out. But that being the case I'd much rather they had six or eight guys to trade from rather than three or four.

Would I trade Abel, Sanchez and one other piece for Valdez or Corbin Burnes (assuming he took extension though he should also cost less since he'll cost more in $)? Sure. But that would mean they Phillies have no cheap young pitching arriving in 2025 or 2026 if Painter doesn't work out.

And Miller is still the only thing we have resembling a future position player starter who is not defense-first (we hope). I consider Crawford or Rojas to be more tradeable (but not yet).

Save the money, honestly. Way too much for a guy with so much bust potential.

Not sure where the bust potential comes from on Yamamoto?

He has spent the last 5 years as one of, if not the best pitcher in the second best pro league in the world, and did it from ages 20 to 24. Even in the public sphere we have enough data to know what his pitches look like. His fastball in March in the WBC was 94-97 vs Australia with vertical movement close to the Spencer Strider space, and we know due to his height and delivery that he comes in flat to the plate with it (which plays up with the "rising" fastball). His splitter has great drop and run, and appears to come from the same arm speed and delivery as the fastball. He has a low 90s, high spin cutter. The curveball might be too big and slow to be a real weapon, but I wouldn't bet against there being some adaptation. Also he has a long history of throwing quality strikes.

So essentially you have a pitcher with top 10-15 stuff (and stuff as we perceive on MLB pitchers, pretty conventional with exception of a splitter vs a changeup), with a long track record of high level performance, who is only 25. His bust potential is that he breaks, but there is nothing that says he is riskier than any other pitcher.

Much as we still say things about the Phillies based on the way the Phillies were in 1983 or 2003, I think the concerns about Yamamoto are based on a different era of information about both foreign baseball and pitchers in general. Clearly none of the teams have these concerns!

I don't think there's much chance of Yamamoto playing for the Phillies but I don't see him as any riskier than giving Wheeler 4-5 years (seems unikely he'll take three) or giving up two prospects for Valdez, or trading for someone you also have to extend.

Matt, they use pitchers with different rest (5-6 days) in Japan, as I'm sure you know. My concern about bust potential is that he's significantly below the minimum height for a typical MLB starting pitcher, has never pitched on "normal" MLB rest, and shorter pitchers are thought to be more prone to arm issues. Even Pedro Martinez was taller than he is. If he were 6'1" or above I'd have much less concern.

I'd rather invest the money in pitcher who has shown he can handle a MLB innings load on traditional rest, or at least fits the physical profile of pitchers who survive the MLB workload.

It's a lot of money...a big bet on projecting success for a "unicorn" with very little supporting evidence of that kind of player succeeding. It's not my money, though...

Of course, if the team that signs him is right about him, with the big risk comes big rewards. It just feels like a long-shot bet to me.

They do, so do most amateurs and minor leaguers. Even in the majors more and more pitchers are going 5 days of rest. Is the "minimum height" just bias? Just look at the current FAs, Sonny Gray 5'10", Marcus Stroman 5'7", Julio Urias 6'0" (using as a height example, his off the field disqualifies him). Aaron Nola is listed at 6'2" but it isn't exactly a normal MLB frame and he has been one of the most durable starters in baseball. Framber Valdez is listed at 5'11".

To a certain extent I agree with you. They do indeed use amateurs and minor leaguers on longer rest. But, to be fair, they don't pay $300 million to sign amateurs or minor leaguers, partly because of the uncertainty of holding up to a MLB workload.

If MLB moves to a different usage pattern that mitigates the risk with Yamamoto. I also didn't realize there were quite as many sub 6'0" starters in MLB now. Phillies have been extreme for a long time in their affection for taller pitchers...

Well we maybe already have. Yamamoto averaged about 7.5IP per game over the last 3 seasons. in 21 and 22 he threw the same amount of innings (193) Wheeler threw last season. He just did it in 6 less starts. So would limiting him to 6IP per start (exactly what Wheeler averaged in 2023) make up for the extra 6 starts

Nattering nabobs of negativism backing up like ballerinas:

"...With the projected price tag to sign the Japanese right-hander continuing to increase, it was thought that ownership and the front office would not be interested in spending that much money on another player."

"It was thought" seems to mean "I thought and wrote".

When you're playing a high-stakes poker hand, you don't need some observer, with nothing of his own in the game. to be chirping that your hand is hopeless and you really don't care if you win, especially when he doesn't KNOW anything. Hard to believe a couple of you guys think that stuff is just peachy.

The Phils are a long shot for Yamamoto. Everybody knows it. DON'T PRINT IT. Let the Phils play the hand.

Thanks to PC for reminding everybody that Yamamoto is not without risk. OTOH, most of MLB is all over this guy. They are not even slowed down by the risk factor. Tells me the Phils should be confident going forward as everybody else is.

The Phils look good because they are already playoff level AND they have a strong pen. Yamamoto could win a lot of 6-inning games with the Phils and protect his arm, maybe set some records. In addition, rumor has it the Phils might be opening 3 or 6 new Japanese restaurants.

MLB doesn't need to 'move to' anything and the Phillies don't have to wait until a consensus of teams emerges around a new SP paradigm. The 6-man rotation has already been used in baseball. I'd like to see the Phillies go that route. If one of the starters goes down, you simply switch to a 5-man rotation.

Journalists dont work for the team. They cover the team. Its their job to write the news and opinions regardless of whether that helps or hurts the team. Which is does neither. Nothing they print is a secret around the league.

Baseball has gone more towards the 6-day rotation than the 6-man rotation. No more skipping the 5th starter when there is an off day. During the course of the season one can probably stay on a 6-day rotation with 5 starters about 60%-70% of the time. A dozen bullpen games and you have a de facto 6-day rotation with 5 starters.

We used to skip 5th starters. Now we don't.

Why not print an opinion, or print what some in the front office may be leaking? What is the damage from printing it?