Even if we went to $35 million per season it would be less than 20% of the salary cap. My choice was MM and I'm sorry the Phillies dropped out, but I'd be happy to have Harper. We don't know that Harper doesn't want to play for the Phillies. What we know is that LA is his favorite destination -- it is close to home and it has Hollywood. Not being his #1 choice is not at all the same thing as not wanting to be in Philly. I'm quite sure that the Phillies aren't the #1 destination for players already on our 25-man roster. We have a lot of young players who had no choice of which team they are playing for. There job, just as Harper's will be if we sign him, is to play baseball for the Phillies. There is not need to have aa grand love affair with the city of Philadelphia. That really is negadelphia thinking -- if you don't truly love us, we don't want you on our team. If you don't believe me, answer this question: excluding guys who stayed for a broadcasting gig, what fraction of your favorite Phillies lived in Philly, or even Philly burbs, after they retired from baseball? If they really loved Philadelphia and the Phillies, they'd have remained local to be with the city and team they loved. Few did. This was just a team and city where they worked. It's their job.
I'm advocating to give Harper our last best offers (long- and short-term), if that hasn't been done and stop negotiating on total $. Dragging it out is a recipe for losing the negotiations. I want to draw the line, not because I don't want Harper, but because I don't want to be seduced into paying a lot more than the team thinks Harper is worth and I don't want to reduce the team-making time in ST.