Benching does serve a purpose, I tell you and I tell you . . .
And Torts was an equal opportunity asshole, with AV, once in his doghouse, never out, with Torts, that was last week's news. He didn't play favorites, I think he benched Couts to send a message to the team, forget your contract, your history or your draft status, you play the right way or you don't play.
He gave Frost numerous opportunities to prove himself, and Frost improved defensively (which will keep him in the league) but never became a top six center, and was a waste as a bottom six center given what his next contract would cost.
He made Brink a lot of money down the road by pushing him for two years to play harder off the puck, Brink got stronger and faster, but also listened to Torts and he's become a dangerous forechecker, not just a guy who hangs out on the perimeter trying to make plays.
Torts was coaching up a team to be prepared for PO hockey, teams can slide through the regular season on talent but in the POs, "true grit" matters. Florida became a winner when they traded for Tkachuk, not just his scoring (Huberdeau wasn' bad) but his physical play. TB traded for Coleman and Goodrow to create an elite checking line with Guorde. And so on.
Montreal is a good example, they've added talent, but they're more hard nosed than the past few years, their coach, Martin St. Louis, a Torts protege. Sullivan revived the Pens with a bunch of checkers from the AHL, another Torts protege.
It's not about fighting, it's about understanding that talent alone doesn't win tight games, the willingness to win board battles, block shots, aggressively forecheck, hound scorers and take away open space. If you watched Canada - US, two tight checking games by the best offensive talent in the world, b/c both teams wanted to win badly and were willing to pay the price.