Misogynistic, much?
And what a strange response to my post. A primary isn't a vetting process that determines who is most qualified to be president. If it were, Trump wouldn't have received the R nomination, ever. It's a contest to determine who can convince the party's primary voters (perhaps 25% of party members in the few states to hold primaries before the selection process is basically over -- perhaps 3% of the party's registered voters, nationwide) that they are good at fund raising
and campaigning.
Harris did beat Trump in a televised debate. She dodged some questions; he was basically wall-to-wall lies. He also dodged questions.
She was questioned on 60 Minutes. Trump refused to appear.
You keep saying nothing really bad happened in Trump's first administration. That was just pure, dumb luck that Trump misjudged Pence's willingness to break laws and his duties under Constitution, that we didn't have a successful coup. Had he picked Vance instead of Pence for his VP, the coup would have succeeded. Pence told us he would not have acted as Mike Pence did. Cheers for Pence -- he's not the guy I would have predicted to be the saver of our democracy, but he absolutely did.
Harris has a low bar to clear to be vastly better than Trump: she's intelligent, she's sane, she's not developing senility, she's honest, she will abide by the law and Constitution, she will abide by the election result, she does not tear down our nation, she doesn't belittle learning and expertise, she respects our soldiers and veterans, she doesn't idolize the world's worst dictators, and she doesn't denigrate classes of people.