Phillies Hot Stove 2022-23

I meant that they turned him into Jean Segura - an All-Star, even! - not that they turned Crawford himself into a good player (but he was still drafted and developed and stepped right into the M's line-up - that the Phillies didn't want him anymore is a whole separate mystery).

Yes, Mets are also unhappy with Correa's medicals and supposedly Boras is standing firm this time, but as many as three teams have also reached out to him. General consensus is he still signs, and there's really still no indication the Phillies ever liked Correa much (or vice-versa). But just for fun/the sake of argument if money was no object I'd give him Bohm's job in a heartbeat, and if money's sort of an object you could move on from Hoskins and/or trade Bohm if you don't want Bohm at 1B and can get something for him.

Sorry to have misinterpreted your comment.

There was enough guys with second half improvements last year that I’m ready to strap on the rose colored glasses and say that 2023 is going to be the year the Phillies Development starts to really turn around and develop a few hitters from a group of guys who are thought well of, though maybe don’t rank high on prospects lists. The kind of depth guys that the Dodgers, Mariners, Braves and the like trade at the deadline and you realize you had never heard of them yet they have at or near .800 OPS while playing in age appropriate leagues.

Carlos De La Cruz was like that last year, but he really boosted his numbers past the deadline when he started to shine.

Kendall Simmons, Marcus Lee Sang- I’m looking at you!

It's about time. But not just those guys, I'm curious to see what they can do with Maton, Marsh, Sosa, Vierling, who all showed flashes. They have the athletic skills to be multiple WAR players with the right coaching, if you can be a plus fielder (and that's also coaching, look at Dickerson with Bohm) you don't have to be a great hitter, just a passable one.

Though if Long can unleash the potential in Bohm and Stott, this is a championship team.

Bohm is still not a plus fielder or anything close to one.

Coaching can only do so much. But continuing to develop young players at the majors is obviously important (and yet also not something that involves the development staff per se, though the new/overdue philosophy of better alignment is obviously a plus).

The Phillies obviously believe Marsh and Sosa both have potential ceilings of everyday player. Not sure there's really more to Vierling other than being a better version of what he already is (and same might be true of Marsh if the more expansive platoon role. But Bohm also still has a ways to go to be more than a platoon player in the long run).

Maton is going to be useful regardless. All current indication seems to be that we'll see a lot more of Maton, Vierling and Sosa rather than Hall to fill the Harper absence (with whomever they supplant in the field on any given day being the actual DH).

Both of those guys must have some strength that isn’t translating in their game yet. Sosa is an athletic guy- but the way he plays you do t see how strong he must be to be athletic and also 6’ and 210 lbs. Great acquisition- he provides current value and some hope for a lot more. Seems like he’s got some potential to pop like Eugenio Suárez did after the tigers traded him to the reds.

It is hard not to like the Sosa acquisition since we only gave up a LH middle reliever with control issues (basically a AAAA pitcher that is replaceable). Sosa definitely has upside and when paired with the modest cost is a really smart acquisition.

With Marsh it is really about whether he is better than O'Hoppe and that is uncertain. It was a positional need so the cost is easily justified. His bar is higher though for that to be a good deal since we gave up more.

I don't really think you have to make a head-to-head comparison of Marsh and O'Hoppe though. It was still basically a present WAR for future WAR deal, in addition to O'Hoppe being blocked, and the higher price was fair because Marsh is young and cheap. They could have just as easily traded O'Hoppe for someone like Hader or Castillo if they'd had a different deadline approach and then it would have been a given that O'Hoppe would be the better player in the long run (assuming he pans out). I still think the Phillies are happy with the trade if Marsh gives them even just two years of production (including the one he already provided) and they probably still win it if he's a useful 4th OF for a few years after that. If he's more than that, they win it by a lot.

Also amusing to think there was some clamor to trade JT back before both he and team changed its trajectory.

Marsh has a lot of upside with his speed and frame, now whether he reaches it is another matter.

But you can say the same about O'Hoppe, who should hit but it remains to be seen if he's athletic enough to be a starting catcher, if he is more Coste than JT he still has value, but not as much as if he can stay as a full-time catcher.

Marsh, from both the eyeball test and from his defensive stats, is an average to slightly below average ML CF defensively. I have no idea if he can improve, but if he doesn't phans will be clamoring for an upgrade there before the end of the season. He projects to be about a 90 WOBA hitter, and that's worth something if paired with good defense...

Where would you set the over/under on his 2023 fWAR? 1.5? Fangraphs projections are 1.1 in basically full-time play.

He and Bohm both seem to have a free pass for at least a year just based on personality and hair and the good vibes of the Series.

In the long run you want Marsh to blossom not so he can be the CF of the future but so that he can play either corner (assuming Rojas steps in and one of the two bad OFs moves to 1B or DH). Obviously right now a defensively poor Schwarber is still a better LF than a light-hitting Marsh, though it's probably closer than we think (and the same is true of playing Sosa more often at 3B against RHP, except there Sosa is actually going to be better).

I'd bet on a little more improvement than the projections say because I do buy that he underperformed offensively in LA. Also, he has less defensive experience in CF so some improvement with repetition is likely there. Is he more than a 2 WAR player though? Probably not. I hope he is but not expecting it.

This is where COVID and other factors complicate projections.
Marsh only had about 1330 minor league PA, the norm is 2000-2500 for HS players.
He should have had 500 PA in AAA at 22, instead of 0, then got rushed to the majors at 23 after 110 AAA PA.

BB rate, 12.2% in A+, 11.4% in AA, 14.5% in his truncated AAA appearance.
Then drops to 7.7% with the Angels and 6.1% last season.
So there's room for improvement once he settles into an everyday role.
1.7 WAR in 461 PA (1.6 BR) with 89 RC+. So he's already a 2+ WAR starter (600 PA).

So if he can just make incremental improvements (up the BB%, reduce K rate from 35% to 25%, improve his play in CF by making better reads off the bat), he has 3+ WAR potential.

Much of his defensive value was compiled in LF where he was plus. CF is another question entirely though as to whether he is at least average or not. Plus, the BABIP was .360 even when you combine the LA and Philly performances. That is why his projections are lower than his WAR in 2022 (though note he may still platoon so getting full time stats is not likely again, so you can't just say his 1.7 WAR is equivalent to 2+ since he may not get more playing time this year.

I just don't buy the COVID explanations you throw up either. Guessing he was at the alternate site for the Angels and also this happened to every single prospect. He was rushed to the majors a little bit because of need, but it is not as if that is unique either. Your last sentence of course is true. Yes if he increases his BB rate while dropping his K rate from 35% to 25% he'll be a lot better. There is just nothing in his record that suggests he can do that level of dramatic improvement. Dropping the K rate by even 5% would be substantial.

One of the things that I like about DD’s style is that supposedly DD asked Long to review tape of Marsh so that DD would have the benefits of long’s insight as to Marsh’s potential.

Can't recall where I saw it, but a couple days ago there was an article suggesting the Phillies sign Wacha, Fullmer and Rafael Ortega.
As far as Wacha, I am fine with Falter/Sanchez/Painter as the fifth starter.
As faras Fullmer, to many walks

Ortega intriques me. He plays center, Marsh moves to left and Schwarber to DH until Harper returns.
Another option I wish would get some traction is what about Hall at 1B and Hoskins at DH?

I like Marsh and think he is going to have a nice career.