Let me clarify the point I was trying to make. We have the reputation, I think deservedly, of having scouts who are good at recognizing the 10K-80K bonus LA talent--not the elite guys, but the mid-low-range guys that comprise most of the DSL rosters. The ability to find the high-end guys you're talking about doesn't impact my question since the high-end guys mostly go stateside right away.
So I was asking if our DSL rosters this year were younger than usual (which I would have NOT expected them to be, since fielding 4 rookie teams in DSL and GCL would seem to incentivize us to keep rather than release older LA players and play more college guys in GCL) or whether it was simply how we split the talent and playing time. Or did we just have a bad year signing mid-level talent in LA?
The DSL pitching, in particular, looks awful.