I am guessing there is more limited info than usual. Probably better to characterize our top 2 prospects as 2 of the top 50 rather than top 30. It is good that we are represented again in a year where we still lose $500K in allocations. After the apparent disappointment in the 2019 class (likely overpaying for our top prospect who is older than anticipated, not signing any other top prospect, losing allocation dollars while apparently not trading for more), it is good to at least return to normalcy.