I could probably go through their 165 spots and identify 50 players with zero chance of getting to AAA, much less the Show. A lot of contract slots go to older players to fill out rosters to support "real" prospects. Then every draft you replace 20-30 of these players with later picks and UDFAs. And of course LA players who graduate from the DSL.
Outside of the top 30-40 prospects, everyone is a long shot, question is who are the best bets?
Overage players who flashed talent like Kennedy? Pitchers coming off injuries? College starters moving to the pen? Late maturing LA players?
The philosophy seems to be load AAA with AAAA types and promising prospects who were stalled elsewhere.
Take chances on long-shot college pitchers, but not so much college position players.
You see a lot more older pitchers at Clearwater and JS than older hitters. Think b/c it's easier to tweak a pitcher (mechanics, a new grip/new pitch) than teach a marginal hitter - if you can't hit a curve/slider, doubt it can be taught.
Cycle through LA players, b/c of short shelf life (eligibility for Rule 5 at 23-24 years old).
So adding a few UDFA college pitchers, start them in low A and see if you can "fix them," is no different than sticking with a LA player who is struggling in A+ ball.