I think you allow your more recent memory of the post-injury, post-shift, older Howard to cloud your memory of the young Howard. Through about his first 5 seasons, Howard was the most prolific HR hitter, for same number of AB at the start of career, in baseball history. And he wasn't just a HR hitter, he was a major performer in OBP and OPS. In his initial five over-300 AB seasons, in which he hit 180 HR, Howard posted OBPs of .356, .425, .392, .339, .360 with OPS of .923, 1.084, .976, 882, .931.
It's a curse to a player to be spoken of as the next Schmidt or Utley, based upon SSS rookie year stats. Hoskins has the advantage of starting in MLB younger than Howard did and starting off on an historic tear. He's a guy to dream on and his youth and superior athleticism (compared to Howard) gives hope that he will be a power force for the Phillies for more years than Howard was. Still it is tempting fate and putting a huge burden on the kids shoulders to declare him to be basically Howard, but with more polish. Frankly, the kid needs to do a ton more good hitting over another 5 seasons to equal Howard, and he will need to do a lot of adjusting to pitcher's and fielders adjustments to pull it off. I do see him as a key core piece on our next post-season team, but let's not get too carried away. With exaggerated expectations come that particular Phillies' curse of fans taking out their frustrations upon players who are simply playing like stars rather than like the totally well-rounded super-stars they had become in the fans' expectations. Rolen, Abreu, and Burrell can tell you all about that.